Volume LTL vs Traditional LTL: Key Differences

Freight shipping isn’t always as simple as filling a trailer or moving a few pallets. For shipments that don’t fit neatly into either extreme, Less Than Truckload (LTL) shipping offers a practical solution. However, not all LTL shipments are created equal. Once freight starts to outgrow standard LTL parameters, Volume LTL becomes a more fitting option.

Understanding the differences between Volume LTL and Traditional LTL is essential for businesses looking to optimize their shipping strategies and avoid unnecessary costs or delays.

Defining Traditional LTL Shipping

Traditional LTL shipping is designed for smaller freight loads that don’t require a full trailer. These shipments typically consist of one to six pallets, weigh less than 5,000 pounds, and occupy a minimal portion of the trailer space.

Because LTL shipments are combined with freight from other shippers, they’re routed through a network of distribution terminals. This hub-and-spoke system helps carriers maximize efficiency but also introduces more handling and potential transit delays. For standard palletized freight with flexible delivery windows, traditional LTL remains a cost-effective option.

What Is Volume LTL?

Volume LTL serves shipments that fall between standard LTL and full truckload. These are loads that exceed typical LTL weight or space limits but still don’t require an entire trailer to themselves. While carrier thresholds vary, Volume LTL generally applies when shipments:

  • Exceed 5,000 pounds

  • Occupy 6 to 30 linear feet of trailer space

  • Consist of more than six pallets

Unlike traditional LTL, Volume LTL shipments are often routed more directly, with fewer stops and transfers. This reduces handling and can lead to quicker, safer deliveries.

Key Differences Between Volume LTL and Traditional LTL

Space and Weight Thresholds
Traditional LTL is priced and structured around smaller shipments. Once freight starts to take up significant trailer space or surpasses certain weight limits, Volume LTL becomes the more practical option. Volume LTL pricing focuses on the space occupied, rather than freight class alone.

Handling and Transit Path
In traditional LTL, freight moves through multiple distribution centers, resulting in more handling. Each transfer point increases the risk of damage or delays. Volume LTL shipments, due to their size, often bypass some of these touchpoints and move on a more direct route, minimizing exposure to mishandling.

Pricing Models
Traditional LTL pricing is based on a combination of freight class, weight, and distance. Volume LTL, however, is typically quoted on a per-shipment basis, with space usage playing a larger role. For mid-sized loads, Volume LTL can offer more cost-effective rates compared to paying premium LTL charges or over-committing to a full truckload.

Transit Time Expectations
Because traditional LTL involves consolidation and multiple transfers, transit times can be longer and less predictable. Volume LTL, while not always as fast as a dedicated truckload, often benefits from more direct routing, leading to improved delivery timelines, especially for longer hauls.

Choosing Between Volume LTL and Traditional LTL

The choice between Volume LTL and Traditional LTL often comes down to the size of the shipment, sensitivity of the freight, and budget considerations. For small, palletized shipments with flexible timelines, traditional LTL remains a reliable option. However, when freight begins to exceed standard limits or when reducing handling becomes a priority, Volume LTL provides a practical alternative.

It’s important to assess each shipment individually. Factors such as delivery deadlines, freight fragility, and overall shipping volume should guide the decision-making process.

Conclusion

Both Volume LTL and Traditional LTL serve important roles in freight logistics. Understanding their distinctions allows shippers to select the most efficient and cost-effective method for their unique shipping needs, ensuring freight arrives safely, on time, and within budget.